press
statement - 2019 General Elections: SOME MATTERS ARISING
Wednesday 20th
March, 2019 4pm
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
The
Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) has halted the collation of
results in Tafawa Balewa Local Government Area (LGA) of Bauchi State based on
an order of a Federal High Court in Abuja, ordering it to stop the collation of
the governorship election results in Bauchi State. Proceeding with the
supplementary elections as originally announced by INEC is consistent with
INEC’s actions in other states.
INEC
has also said that it would not present the Certificate of Return to Governor
Rochas Okorocha for Imo West Senatorial District because the Returning Officer,
Professor Innocent Ibeabuchi indicated that the declaration was made under
duress. It is important that in all elections INEC officials are protected from
harm and allowed to do their constitutional assignments. Assaulting INEC
officials is wrong, criminal and must not reoccur in future elections. Wherever
such did occur during the 2019 General Elections, the law should be followed to
bring the culprits to book.
However it
is important to ask some questions when considering this issue:
a.
Does
the law at present give INEC the power to withhold a Certificate of Return for
an elected official even though the declaration was made under duress?
b.
What
evidence is INEC relying on to affirm that it’s Returning Officer declared the
winner under duress? Is the admission of the RO sufficient or is there additional
information to corroborate this position?
c.
After
the announcement of results from 9 LGAs on the night of Sunday 24th
February 2019, why did the Imo State Resident Electoral Commissioner (REC),
Francis Ezeonu call to request for the Returning Officer, Professor Ibeabuchi
to return to Owerri to continue the collation process on Monday 25th February
2019?
d.
Was
there any security breach prior to this action which necessitated this?
e.
Was
any effort made to explain to party agents about the REC's decision and what necessitated
it?
f.
Did
the REC have the legal standing to act in this manner?
g.
Why
didn't the Returning Officer announce the results of the remaining 3 LGAs (Oru
West, Ugwuta and Orlu) immediately they arrived the Collation Centre?
h.
One
of the reports in the public domain is that the Returning Officer was of the
opinion that results from the LGAs were inflated in favour of a particular candidate.
If this is true, were there reports made by the LGA collation officers to this
effect?
i.
If
it happens that no such reports were made, does the Returning Officer have the
legal right to contest the results provided by the LGA collation officers?
j.
Where
were the security agents at the time the results for Imo West Senatorial
District were being declared? What is the security report on the issue?
k.
Was
the candidate affected given a fair hearing to state his own side before being
denied his Certificate of Return?
l.
Considering
the collated results at the Local Government Area level, are these when added
together consistent or different from what was announced at the Senatorial
Constituency Collation Centre in Orlu, Imo State?
m.
In
the instance that the collation of figures from the Local Government Area level
were consistent with what was eventually declared what would be the essence of
putting the Returning Officer under duress to announce the results apart from
the fact that he was requested to conclude the collation in Owerri the Imo
State Capital which is not the standard practice?
n.
Were
there additional INEC officials outside the RO who witnessed this incident?
o.
How
exactly was the RO put under duress? Was there an invasion into the Senatorial
Constituency Collation Centre and the security agents subdued or was it the
security agents who were engaged to put the Returning Officer under duress? Was
the RO assaulted? Was the RO prevented from announcing the results that had
arrived already or hindered from leaving the collation centre without
completing the collation process?
Meanwhile,
in the Abia North Senatorial District election there are reports in the media
that Chief Orji Uzor Kalu (APC) polled 31,201 votes while the runner-up Senator
Mao Ohuabunwa (PDP) polled 20,801 votes. The reports further state that there
were 38,526 cancellations recorded during the exercise while the gap between
the first place and runner stands at 10,400. If these reports are factual then
this satisfies the condition for an inconclusive election which was not
announced by INEC after the election.
The
information on social media and unfortunately being supported by some political
actors is that there were over five million cancellations from the 2019
Presidential Election are false. The results collation was on live TV and
anyone could have collated the total cancellations as they were announced for
each state. These political actors are
going further to say that this figure is greater than the gap between the
winner and the runner-up and making diverse inferences. Some of these
misleading information are even been discussed on mainstream media which is not
appropriate and further misleads the public.
Election
Monitor makes the following recommendations:
The Independent
National Electoral Commission (INEC)
·
It
is important for INEC to ensure its actions are always guided by the law
especially as it is a creation of Nigerian Law. This is important because inconsistency
in the actions of the Commission could jeopardize peace and security in the
country.
·
It is germane for INEC to publicly state what
the results were in the Abia North Senatorial District and the number of
cancellations recorded. If the INEC figures tally with the reports in the
public domain, then INEC needs to explain why the Abia North Senatorial
District election was not determined inconclusive and who was responsible for
this?
·
In
the case of Imo West senatorial district election, INEC should immediately
issue the Certificate of Return to the person who was returned as winner as
this is in conformity with the current legal provisions on the matter.
·
INEC
should seek audience with the National Assembly to see how the electoral laws
can be amended to address situations where election officials are required to
make returns under duress.
Nigeria Police
Force (NPF) and other security agencies
·
The
Police and other security agencies should make public their deployments for the
six supplementary governorship elections and state constituency re-run
elections slated to hold on Saturday 23rd March 2019.
·
The
police should urgently investigate some political actors spreading unverified reports
about intentions to ‘purportedly depose’ some traditional and religious
leaders. These sorts of statements are inciting and must be quickly nipped in
the bud so as not to lead to a breach of the peace especially considering the
ethno-religious crises Nigeria has experienced in the past.
·
It
is important for stakeholders to differentiate between the misconduct of some
security agents and ‘militarisation’ of an entire election. The 2019 General
Elections were not ‘militarised’ even though some personnel of security
agencies including the military may have acted outside their legal mandate. The
military performed in a largely commendable manner but areas where it fell
short would clearly need to be identified and addressed.
Federal Government
·
The
Federal Government should consider a surge of military activities in states of
the North-Western region experiencing increasing banditry attacks so as to
eradicate the menace of the armed bandits who have been terrorizing its
inhabitants especially as these bandits are reported to be better trained and
having more sophisticated equipment than conventional armed robbers.
National Assembly
·
The
National Assembly should be circumspect to avoid politicising the involvement
of the military in the 2019 General elections.
·
Public
hearings should urgently be called in both arms of the legislature to enable
stakeholders present their findings from the 2019 General Elections.
The National Assembly should kindly review the Electoral Act (amendment) Bill before sending it to the president for assent. Attempting to resend the Bill without making necessary inputs especially as a result of recent developments from the 2019 General Elections would certainly not be helpful to the nation's electoral process.
The National Assembly should kindly review the Electoral Act (amendment) Bill before sending it to the president for assent. Attempting to resend the Bill without making necessary inputs especially as a result of recent developments from the 2019 General Elections would certainly not be helpful to the nation's electoral process.
National Peace
Committee
·
The
Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) has filed a petition in court relating to the
2019 Presidential election. The All Progressives Congress (APC) has also
requested to inspect materials used for the elections. Since both parties are
involved in the legal process, it becomes necessary for both parties to agree
to remain peaceful and urge their supporters to remain peaceful after the
conclusion of the legal process. To this end, the National Peace Committee is
encouraged to hold another peace accord signing event where the litigants will
confirm their commitment to peace during and after the entire legal
process is concluded.
Political Parties
·
While
political parties and their candidates are free to seek legal redress, it is
dangerous for these political actors to make unverified claims in the public
especially as relates to the results of elections. Since these issues are
before the courts, they would be adjudicated upon. However spreading
information in the media about ‘perceived’ results could mislead some members
of the public which would only heat up the polity unnecessarily.
Media
·
Journalists
should endeavour to invest more effort in obtaining accurate figures relating
to the conduct of elections. This will help in correcting guests who cite
fictitious figures so as to intentionally mislead the public.
God
Bless the Federal Republic of Nigeria
Signed
Abiodun
Ajijola
National
Coordinator
No comments:
Post a Comment